A. K.


A
B
C
D

Texas Governor Rick Perry has released a new campaign ad on YouTube to help boost his slumping numbers in the 2012 GOP Primary Race. The ad targets the Christian Evangelical base of the Republican Party. Specifically, its intentions are to string a cord within the Christian Evangelical community and garner their support by conveying an extremely homophobic and highly theocratic message. 

Following embarrassing performances in several Republican debates, Perry's numbers have plummeted in the polls. Perry entered the race to become the GOP Presidential nominee on August 13, and he immediately became the front-runner in the polls. He held that spot for five weeks peaking with a 19 point lead over Mitt Romney on the 1st of September, but then his numbers began to steadily decline. Now he finds himself near the bottom of the candidates with only 5% support in the most recent Gallop Poll.  

Perry needed to act and act quickly in an attempt to re-energize his campaign and create enthusiasm and support from potential GOP primary voters. As one of several Evangelical Republican potential nominees, Perry's campaign needed to create some noise to separate himself from the rest of the group. Therefore, his campaign chose to draw a staunch line in the sand with the following message in his ad: 

"I'm not ashamed to admit that I'm a Christian, but you don't need to be in the pew every Sunday to know there's something wrong in this country when gays can serve openly in the military but our kids can't openly celebrate Christmas or pray in school.

As President, I'll end Obama's war on religion. And I'll fight against liberal attacks on our religious heritage.

Faith made America strong. It can make her strong again.
I'm Rick Perry and I approve this message."

Is such bigoted and theocratic language acceptable in America? Isn't America supposed to represent equality and justice before the law and equal opportunity for all to strive to achieve one's goals? And which Church liturgy would Perry like our public schools that are paid for by tax funds from ALL AMERICANS, including Muslims, Jews, Athiests, Hindus, and other faiths, to forcibly teach our children? 

Personally, I am an Orthodox Christian, and I don't want Protestant guided prayer to be taught to my children. In particular, I don't want Evangelical Christianity to be taught to my children whatsoever. However, this is besides the point and only an example of why even Christians don't all agree or want schools being involved with guiding our children's spiritual growth. America is a secular country, and has never been a theocracy. The Separation of Church and State is a fundamental underlying principle in our Constitution protecting individual liberties and freedoms. The Constitution grants Americans the right to choose what religion to follow, and whether to follow a religion at all. State institutions are barred by the Separation clause from favoring any religion, and this includes Christianity.

In the year 2011 is such homophobic and discriminatory language still acceptable from a politician running for president? Yes, what Perry said is not just homophobic, but also discriminatory to gay and lesbian Americans. Singling out one group (gay/lesbian Americans wanting to serve in the military) and denying them the right to freely participate in any aspect of society that all others are permitted (all other Americans are permitted to serve) is the very definition of discrimination. 

Finally, is this what defines the fabric of Christian America? Is the evangelical message the message of American Christianity? It definitely is not for me, and I wish it did not define the voice of American Christianity. However, there is no counter Christian block in American politics to the Evangelicals. Unfortunately, those of us Christians that love and accept all people and judge them by the content of their character have no representation in US Christianity and Politics. We are too few and far apart. 

I obviously don't think Perry's anti-gay ad should be acceptable in America, but I do unfortunately believe his Evangelical Christianity is the American brand of Christianity. Of course, there are small pockets of Christians here and there that do not adopt the Evangelical message, but their voice is not a part of the political discourse that represents Christianity in US politics. Anyways, what do you think?

Is Rick Perry's new anti-gay ad acceptable in America? Does this message define the fabric of Christian America?

A. K. A. K.

A
B
C

Will Ferrell teamed up with Milwaukee Beer to create the following advertisements. Check them out and then vote for your favorite!

A. K. A. K.

A
B

Listening to the Bernie Fine case, I am quite shocked to learn there is a statute of limitations in cases involving pedophile's and child molestation. The victim, Bobby Davis, was prevented from bringing charges and seeking justice against Bernie Fine because too many years had passed since the crime occurred.


I understand why there is a statute of limitations on many different types of crimes, but under the circumstances of child molestation and what we know it makes no sense. Victims of molestation are usually ashamed and afraid to turn in their abusers. It often requires a major event occurring that triggers them to finally do it. It can take years if not decades for a victim to finally get the courage to step up and tell their story.

The very fact the victim of the crime is a child should be reason enough for their not to be any limits on how long you can wait before you turn the person in. If you were molested when you were six, then you should be able to turn that sicko in whenever you get the courage to do so. How can we allow known pedophiles to continue walking the streets and harming young children just because a victim didn't turn them in right away? This makes absolutely no sense.

A. K. A. K.

A
B
C

In the 2010 elections, Republicans won control of the legislature in the state of North Carolina for the first time since right after the Civil War. Immediately following their electoral victory, they hired a GOP expert from Washington D.C. to travel to North Carolina to redraw the districts of the state, and then they quickly passed it in the state legislature via a party line vote. 


This so-called expert was brought in to "Gerrymander" the districts of the state, meaning he was tasked with redrawing district lines in a favorable way as to protect GOP incumbents and add GOP Congressional seats by weeding out the Democrats. Basically, they draw the district lines in a manner that attenuates Democratic voters from incumbent Republican districts, and then they end up either jam-packing them into only a few districts or diluting their strength by spreading them and their votes around in multiple districts. 

In North Carolina, 95% of registered Republicans are White Americans, leaving only 5% of Republicans to represent minorities. 96% of the state's registered African American voters are Democrats. The Republican party is basically an all white party in that state (and in the South, in general), while the Democrats of North Carolina are highly diverse. 

The politicians are using the Cape Fear River in North Carolina to cram in as many black people as possible into just a few Congressional Districts. Half of one district, for instance, begins on one bank of the river and connects to its other half farther downstream. The two halves share the river to comply with the contiguous territorial requirements for a district. Essentially, the Republicans are splitting precincts to include the black people in one district, while purging them from another. 

The redistricting procedure has allowed the Republicans to whitewash the districts surrounding African American majority areas. They take all the black people out of the surrounding districts and stuff them into a black majority district to ensure a majority of voters in a majority of the districts are white and predictably Republican. In the example provided, the southern half of the district was made to include another 100,000 voters, mostly black and Democratic, with the northern majority black and Democratic half of the newly created district.

By design, 49% of African Americans in North Carolina have been jam-packed into only 3 of North Carolina's 13 Congressional Districts, and Republicans further undermine the potential political strength of the rest of the black voters by spreading them around the other 10 Congressional Districts. The NAACP calls these measures an act to re-segregate the South. North Carolina state senator Dan Blume says "its a concerted effort to ghettoize the black vote in North Carolina." When asked whether its just power politics or racism, Blume was quick to respond by saying "it's racism and it weakens the country." 


Furthermore, the whitewashing of the surrounding districts is also deepening the racial divide already at play in the politics of the South. In the "Deep South's" five states, SC, GA, AL, MS, and LA, only 9 Democratic Congressman exist, and only one of them is white. By 2013, however, it is highly likely there will no longer be any white Democrats in the South because the current one is most likely going to lose his seat after Gerrymandering has taken his hometown of Savannah, GA out of his Congressional District.

The Civil Rights Act of 1965 guarantees black voters "an equal opportunity" to vote on and elect any candidate of their choice. However, when black people are overstuffed into districts of their own, the strength and effectiveness of their vote is greatly weakened. The collective strength of their voice is diminished because now African Americans are voting in the same district, and can only influence its outcome instead of being able to influence the outcome of multiple districts. 

Currently in North Carolina, for instance, Democrats have 7 seats in Congress and Republicans have only 6. Next year, Republicans will most likely end up with 10 seats. The only 3 Democratic seats will be from the 3 majority African American districts. Black incumbents currently hold two of the districts being jam-packed with additional black voters. The other Democratic seat is held by a Caucasian American, David Price, and he has also seen an influx of African American voters due to the redistricting. Brad Miller, another current Democratic Congressman from Raleigh, was elected ten years ago when he won the additional Congressional seat granted to North Carolina because of an increase in population. This year, however, 100,000 voters, the vast majority of which are black, were redistricted along with Congressman Miller's home into the other side of Raleigh and into Price's district.

It is clear the Republicans are dividing the district lines according to race. It is also clear they are attempting to stuff as many black people into their own few districts as possible. They are literally separating black voters from voting at the same election office and on the same ballot as white voters. The Republicans are also clearly attempting to undermine the collective political strength of African Americans, and have designed a system which minimizes the impact of their vote. However, are these actions really acts of segregation?

Is Republican Gerrymandering an attempt to re segregate the South?

A. K. A. K.

A
B

Robert Griffin III (RG3) is hands down the best college football player in the nation. The fact the Baylor Bears are not a good football team should not keep him from winning the award. Its not the Bears offense that is terrible, it is the Bears defense. The offense led by Griffin has played good enough in every game this year.


Even though his defense is terrible, Griffin has been able to lead the Bears to a 7-3 record with two more games left to play. Their three losses came against #3 Oklahoma State Cowboys, #14 Kansas State Wildcats, and #21 Texas A&M. His big wins of the season came against #14 TCU Horned Frogs and #5 Oklahoma Sooners.

The following are RG3's statistics

Robert Griffin III Total Season Statistics
  • Passing Statistics: 224 pass completions; 302 passing attempts; 3093 yards; 74.2 completion percentage; 10.24 yards per attempt, 77 yard long; 29 touchdowns; 5 interceptions
  • Rushing Statistics: 117 rushing attempts; 478 yards; 4.1 yard average per carry; 49 yard long; 5 touchdowns
For More Heisman Polls, visit:

A. K. A. K.

A
B

I'm a die hard Auburn Tigers Football fan and I recently bought my wife an outfit that makes her look like a Tiger. Hey, I find it hot!

A. K. A. K.

A
B

War Eagle!

A. K. A. K.

A
B

The former Heisman Trophy Winner, Cam Newton, began his NFL career under attack from critics doubting his NFL quarterback potential. However, he has shut the critics up midway through his rookie season. After eight games, he has the second most passing yards in the nation, and has accounted for 18 total touchdowns - 11 passing and 7 rushing. Newton has looked dominant at times.

If he continues playing as he as...Will Cam Newton win NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year?

A. K. A. K.

A
B

Dylan Ratigan from MSNBC says Americans are fed up at our government because it is corrupt and unfair. Ratigan says our government is corrupt and defines the corruption as "there are platinum citizens. there are institutions within the financial institutions that have control of our government that get treated differently than anyone else in America." He says there are two types of citizens in America - platinum citizens and non-platinum citizens. He defines platinum citizens as those with "the rights of the too big to fail banking institutions to take out as much money as they want and to gamble as much as they want." The non-platinum citizens are "all the students with the student debt, which is all the unemployment in this country, which is all the retirees that are getting zero percent interest." 


Next, Ratigan says the citizens of our country are deeply against what they perceive is unfairness in the system. He says the Tea Party and the Occupied Wall Street movements are driven by unfairness in the US political system. 

Still, more shocking, are Ratigan's comments about how 94% of elections are won by the candidate who raises the most money. Politifact fact checked these numbers and came up with the following: 

"Indeed, the percentage for 2010 was lower than it had been in recent election cycles. The center found that in 2008, the biggest spenders won 93 percent of House races and 86 percent of Senate races. In 2006, the top spenders won 94 percent of House races and 73 percent of Senate races. And in 2004, 98 percent of House seats went to candidates who spent the most, as did 88 percent of Senate seats." 

So Ratigan's number was slightly off, but his point is still relevant. He flat out accuses the US government of being purchased by lobbyists and special interests groups pouring money into candidates electoral races. The candidates are then beholden to these special interest and lobby groups because of their donations. Do you agree with his assessment? 

Is the US government bought and owned by lobbyists and special interests?

A. K. A. K.

A
B

Listen to the video below (from MorningJoe.com) concerning the discussion of President Obama's actions this week towards the Palestinians and their bid to be officially recognized by the United Nations as a state. In the video, Maen Areikat, the Chief Palestinian Negotiator to the US, argues the purpose of going forward with the UN vote is to create an equal playing field for the Palestinians at the negotiation table with the Israeli's. 


President Obama has been scrambling around in an attempt to avert this from occurring. The video above, provided by the AP, explains the different acts Obama has taken to undermine the Palestinians. It is also believed Obama will choose to vote against the Palestinians in the security council and could administrate a US veto.

Areikat says if America does anything but vote for the Palestinian state at the UN, it will be viewed as a move to derail and prevent the Palestinians from moving forward. The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is the single most important issue for America in the Middle East. America has historically been viewed as biased and the enabler of the oldest occupation - the Israeli Military Occupation of Palestine - by Arabs and Muslims throughout the world. Osama bin Laden cited the US's involvement in the Conflict as one of the main driving forces behind al Qaeda's motivation.

Poll after poll shows America is primarily disliked by the Arab people because of its support of Israel in its oppression of the Palestinians. Throughout the conflict, America has armed the Israeli's to the teeth to fight against a civilian population. The US has also historically exercised a veto for Israel in the UN Security Council to prevent any international condemnation for war crimes and human rights violations Israel commits against the Palestinians. 

With this in mind, what is Obama thinking? Listen to the videos provided and think about the consequences of his decisions. Is he doing the right thing? Is it in the best interests of America?

A. K. A. K.