It all happened in one episode: Penny and Raj hooked up, Leonard and Priya broke up and it all looks like a set up for a very predictable next season on The Big Bang Theory. After Leonard sees that Penny has been with Raj, I’m going to bet that he’ll get jealous and reconnect with Penny. What do you think? Will Penny and Leonard get back together again?
Check out the sexy photo of Katey Cuolo who plays Penny from Big Bang Theory. Is Penny Hot?
In the last season of The Big Bang Theory, Leonard Hofstadter and Penny decided to end their relationship. After this happened, Leonard started dating Raj Koothrappali's sister, Priya Koothrappali. However, Leonard's relationship with Priya does not last long. She moves home to India and shortly thereafter, both Priya and Leonard cheat on each other ending their short lived romance.During his relationship with Priya, there were many times in which we see Leonard still holding onto Penny. For example, Priya told him she wanted him to tell Penny that they needed to stop hanging out because he had a new girlfriend, but he ends up not doing it. Priya finds out while they are out on a date and Penny comes to their table and chit chats with Leonard as though nothing had happened. Obviously, this angered Priya and she once again pushed him to tell Penny they need to stop hanging out. He never really does it completely and Penny is still always around.I think Leonard acts like he still loves, but what do you think? Does Leonard still love Penny in Big Bang Theory?
In a recent Big Bang Theory, Leonard confesses to Penny that he used to do all the things she wanted and faked enjoying them so she would have sex with him. This included letting Penny choose what movies they would see, where they would go out, and where they would go to dinner. Was Leonard wrong for doing that?
In Episode 7 of Season 5 of The Big Bang Theory, Leonard ended his long distance relationship to Priya after they find out they both cheated on each other. During Leonard's entire relationship with Priya, Penny is jealous. Initially, she couldn't believe Leonard had already moved on, and she never does the same choosing to remain single. She seems to always be hanging around Leonard's friends and their girlfriends. In my opinion, it is clear she not only did not move on, but that she does not want to move on.In Episode 9 of Season 5, Leonard and Penny hang out alone for the first time since breaking up. Penny asks Leonard to join her to a movie, but initially he resists. However, he agrees after Penny tells him "it's not a date Leonard. It's just a man and a woman hanging out and not having sex at the end of the night." For the first time ever, Leonard actually takes control of an evening with Penny. He makes her go to the movie he wants to see and he makes her pay her own way. He used to go to movies she wanted to see so she would have sex with him at the end of the night, but since sex is "off-the-table" he doesn't see any reason to not choose the film he wants to see.After the movie, they hang out in a cafe/bar setting. While there, Leonard makes a point of letting Penny know they aren't on a date. Therefore, Penny starts talking to a random guy and discusses the science based movie she just watched with Leonard with her new friend. Leonard becomes jealous, and declares he will do the same and find someone to hit on. Shortly thereafter, he begins talking to a girl named Laura about the things he likes to do, which includes a list of activities he used to do with Penny. Penny ends her conversation with the random fellow she was talking to and disrupts Leonard. She begins telling Laura embarrassing secrets about Leonard such as how he has two Star Trek costumes that he wears on days other than Halloween, how half of his porn is animated, and how he has a "lucky" inhaler. Leonard argues with Penny and starts calling her out for her shortcomings as well. They go back and forth and end up forgetting about Laura. Penny eventually tells Leonard to take her home, and when he turns to address Laura she is gone.When they get back to the apartment, Penny says how she really enjoyed the "take charge Leonard with a little backbone. Picking the movie, knowing what he wants, and a little cocky." Also, the random guy Penny was talking to at the cafe is eerily similar to Leonard. As Penny puts it, the guy was cute in his "dorky t-shirt and hipster glasses," which just so happens to be exactly what Leonard was wearing and almost always is wearing. Though the sexual tension could be cut with a butter knife in the hallway of their apartments, they both go home alone. Though they didn't "hookup," does it appear Penny still loves Leonard?
It took some time for me to become a big fan of The Big Bang Theory and now I hear the CBS sitcom is being renewed for three seasons. I think the show started out a little lame; a nerd, Leonard, in love with the hot girl, Penny, across the hall. I started liking it better as they moved away from this concept and made Penny more interesting and interacting with all the characters. Now days, She and Sheldon have tension in their relationship which is based on a little hate and a little respect. This often leads to some very funny moments, but sometimes I think the focus is turned toward Sheldon too much. Although I love his character, He should not be the main course! All five of the main characters can hold their own so the producers should spread the focus on all of their stories. Do you think this seasons episodes of The Big Bang Theory gives us too much Sheldon?
In the 9th Episode of The Big Bang Theory Season 5, Sheldon Cooper is seen scared to death from a bird hanging out outside of his window. When Penny and Leonard ask Sheldon why he is freaking out, he tells them he has Ornithophobia - a fear of birds. Throughout the episode, the bird torments him from the window. He calls animal control to come remove the bird that he describes as a "bluejay," and they laugh at him. The bird, however, appears to be of a more exotic species of bird and not a "bluejay" as Sheldon claims. His next attempt of getting rid of the bird included drawing the head of a cat with whiskers and all on a notebook, holding it up to his face, and then making cat noises. Obviously, this was not successful. His next idea is to create a machine that Howard and Raj call a "Death Ray," which Sheldon vehemently rejects as a name for his devise. Sheldon's intent for the machine is for it to generate sound waves that scare off the bird. When he uses it, however, all it ends up doing is shattering the window's glass and the bird doesn't budge.His fourth attempt of getting rid of the bird is to put on a mask and use a broom to "shoo" the bird away. When he opens the window to scare the bird, it ends up flying into the apartment. This prompts Sheldon to call Amy Fowler and Bernadette to come deal with the bird since they are biologists. While Bernadette is carrying the bird, that she realizes is someone's pet, Sheldon actually asks her to carefully take it to the bathroom and "flush it down the toilet." Eventually Bernadette and Amy convince Sheldon to pet the bird, and he ends up loving it and wants to make it his pet.The question here, however, is how rational is it for a grown man as intelligent as Sheldon to actually be afraid of a bird? Even Sheldon acknowledges "this is ridiculous. I'm a grown man from Texas. This isn't a terrifying bird like a swan or a goose."
AUDIENCE QUESTION: "Currently, there’s a deficit reduction measure to cut defense spending by $500 billion. Would you support such a reduction in defense spending? And if elected president, how will you provide a strong national defense?" CNN's Anderson Cooper directs the question as follows: "Congresswoman Bachmann, should defense be cut?"Michele BachmannCongresswoman Bachmann responds saying: "Well, $500 billion is the amount that the questioner had mentioned. And don’t forget, this was an historic week when it came to American foreign policy. We saw potentially an international assassination attempt from Iran on American soil. That says something about Iran, that they disrespect the United States so much, that they would attempt some sort of heinous act like that. Then, we saw the president of the United States engage American troops in a fourth conflict in a foreign land. This is historic. Then, on Sunday, we heard the reports that now that — in Iraq, the 5,000 troops that were going to be left there won’t even be granted immunity by Iraq. This is how disrespected the United States is in the world today, and it’s because of President Obama’s failed policies. He’s taken his eyes off the number one issue in the world. That’s an Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. That makes all of us in much danger. And the president of Iran is a genocidal maniac. We need to stand up against Iran. And as president of the United States, I will. We will be respected again in the world.Cooper interrupts Bachmann stating: "The question though was about budget cuts. And is everything on the table in terms of cutting the budget?" Bachmann says "Absolutely everything," and Cooper attempts to make sure he is clear on her position by asking her again: "So defense spending would be on the table, should be?"Again, Bachmann says "Defense spending is on the table, but again, Anderson, now with the president, he put us in Libya. He is now putting us in Africa. We already were stretched too thin, and he put our Special Operations Forces in Africa." Bachmann does, however, say they are "on the table, but we cannot cut it by $500 billion. We can’t do that to tour brave men and women who are on the ground fighting for us."Newt GingrichGingrich responds to the question saying "I mean, if you want to understand how totally broken Washington is, look at this entire model of the super committee, which has now got a magic number to achieve. And if it doesn’t achieve the magic number, then we’ll all have to shoot ourselves in the head so that when they come back with a really dumb idea to merely cut off our right leg, we’ll all be grateful that they’re only semi-stupid instead of being totally stupid. Now, the idea that you have a bunch of historically illiterate politicians who have no sophistication about national security trying to make a numerical decision about the size of the defense budget tells you everything you need to know about the bankruptcy of the current elite in this country in both parties. The fact is, we ought to first figure out what threaten us, we ought to figure out what strategies will respond to that. We should figure out what structures we need for those strategies. We should then cost them.I helped found the Military Reform Caucus. I’m a hawk, but I’m a cheap hawk. But the fact is, to say I’m going to put the security of the United States up against some arbitrary budget number is suicidally stupid."Ron PaulCooper says "Congressman Paul, you just proposed eliminating the Departments of Commerce, Education, Energy, Interior, Housing and Urban Development. You say it will save a trillion dollars in one year. You’re proposing a 15 percent cut to the Defense Department. Can you guarantee national security will not be hurt by that?"Paul quickly states: "I think it would be enhanced. I don’t want to cut any defense. And you have to get it straight. There’s a lot of money spent in the military budget that doesn’t do any good for our defense.How does it help us to keep troops in Korea all these years? We’re broke. We have to borrow this money.Why are we in Japan? Why do we subsidize Germany, and they subsidize their socialized system over there? Because we pay for it. We’re broke. And this whole thing that this can’t be on the table, I’ll tell you what, this debt bubble is the thing you better really worry about, because it’s imploding on us right now. It’s worldwide. We are no more removed from this than the man on the moon. It’s going to get much worse. And to cut military spending is a wise thing to do. We would be safer if we weren’t in so many places. We have an empire. We can’t afford it. The empires always bring great nations down. We spread ourselves too thinly around the world. This is what’s happened throughout history, and we’re doing it to ourselves. The most recent empire to fail was an empire that went into, of all places, Afghanistan. They went broke. So where are we? In Afghanistan. I say it’s time to come home."(Read Santorum first - this is Paul's response) Well, I think we’re on economic suicide if we’re not even willing to look at some of these overseas expenditures, 150 bases — 900 bases, 150 different countries. We have enough weapons to blow up the world about 20-25 times. We have more weapons than all the other countries put together essentially. And we want to spend more and more, and you can’t cut a penny? I mean, this is why we’re at an impasse. I want to hear somebody up here willing to cut something. Something real. This budget is in bad shape and the financial calamity is going to be much worse than anybody ever invading this country. Which country — are they going to invade this country? They can’t even shoot a missile at us.Rick SantorumHe jumps into the conversation saying "To address Congressman Paul’s answer and the other answer on military spending, I would absolutely not cut one penny out of military spending. The first order of the federal government, the only thing the federal government can do that no other level of government can do is protect us. It is the first duty of the president of the United States is to protect us. And we should have the resources — we should have all the resources in place to make sure that we can defend our borders, that we can make sure that when we engage in foreign countries, we do so to succeed.That has been the problem in this administration. We’ve had political objectives instead of objectives for success. And that’s why we haven’t succeeded. Which GOP Policy Position do you support?
Danica McKellar, that's right Winnie Cooper from The Wonder Years, is not only the embodiment of girl-next-door innocence and beauty that drew us to the nostalgic sitcom, but also a stunningly stellar mathematician, having graduated Summa cum Laude from UCLA with a degree in Mathematics. In 1998, her imdb.com profile reads, she "had a paper published in Britain's "Journal of Physics A: Mathematics & General" with UCLA professor Lincoln Chayes and student Brandy Winn that provided a mathematical proof for a theorem dealing with magnetism in two dimensions." Did your brain implode a little, just now? Yeah, me too. (From the math, not the exposed navel!) But that's probably just because I'm a girl. Doesn't sound like something me or any other woman should say, does it? Earlier this year, retailer Forever 21 made a mockery of chicks' math skills and it got brainy Danica pretty pissed. "Forever 21 recently promoted a magnet on their website that said, “I’m Too Pretty to Do Math.” I was thinking instead they could try, “I’m Too Stupid to Write Slogans,” she blogged here."Someone tweeted me that if the company had produced a magnet that says “I’m Too Pretty to Vote” that it might hit home a bit more. How about even “I’m Too Pretty to Read”?"I mean, really?," she wrote. "We’re still promoting the idea that somehow looks and smarts are mutually exclusive? It’s so limiting for girls (and women)!! It’s one of the main reasons I write my books. It’s like we’re living in the Stone Age with regard to these stereotypes… but with every email I get from my readers, I gain hope." All in all, the company pulled the magnets, but the dumb girl chic trend rages on regardless. JC Penny announced just this week that it has stopped selling a girls tee with the tag line: "I'm too pretty to do homework so my brother has to do it for me." Is Danica right that marketed sexist stereotypes are a detriment to our society's young girls? Or are products like this meant to be funny and provocative?
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 Another vineyard year begins and, like the mythology Phoenix, our optimism rises yet again from the problems and ashes of previous years. 2009 is our thirtieth year farming grapes here in Sonoma Valley. On January 16th, 1979 I quit what my dear wife Greta still calls my ?good job? at Monsanto. On January 17th we moved into an abandoned shack on an entirely undeveloped 50 acres in the heart of the Valley of the Moon. Our dream was to convert this rocky hillside ranch into a beautiful vineyard, to produce grapes of exceptional quality, make lots of money selling our grapes to prestigious wineries, gain recognition, be our own bosses, and live forever! Thirty years later, the dream is still alive. I guess you could say that the MacLeods are either incredible optimistic, stubbornly persistent, or just plain slow learners. Except for the making money part, we have been blessed to achieve every part of the dream. But we have been paid extremely generously in other coin. Years of great and interesting work for us and our family, pure joy in watching our vineyard develop as a source of great grapes, the excitement of each harvest, of beginning to make our own wine, and of making so many friends in our community. I suppose the jury is still out on the ?live forever? part of the dream. But at 87, I still can?t imagine anything I?d rather be doing. Not bad for an out-of-control retirement project. Author`s Note: Work in the vineyard long enough, and you begin to feel that your vines have a mind of their own. So starting with last year?s Journey to Harvest, we decided to let the vines speak for themselves, selecting one vine each to represent our lead varieties and giving each a personality of their own ? Marie for the Sauvignon Blanc vines, and Javier for the Zinfandel. Again this year, I invite you to join with me in this small piece of tomfoolery, as I devote a portion of each month?s Journey to Harvest column to a flight of fancy, and imagine that the vines can speak for themselves. The February vineyard is still asleep (dormant). But over the winter vineyard manager Chuey, sone John and the Old Patron have made some aggressive vineyard improvement plans to improve yield and quality of our grapes. Let?s hear from our vineyard vine representatives Marie and Javier: Marie`s Sauvignon Blanc Report: ?What now? Looks like the old Patron is up to his old tricks ? expanding the use of new pruning techniques in his incessant quest for ultimate grape quality. This season we will convert an entire Sauvignon Blanc block from cordon pruning to cane pruning. Not that I mind. Last year he did a small evaluation test and had very favorable results. My cordons are about 12 to 14 years old now, and there is significant evidence that after ten or so years, cordon pruned vines gradually become less productive. The reasons are complex. Possibly repeated annual pruning has created scar tissue inside the cordon. Or perhaps there are various viruses that have invaded the cordon through unhealed pruning scars. My vine friends and I have been producing fabulous grapes, but the quantities are barely above dollar breakeven. We are, of course, worth every penny. So go for it George, experiment away and make us beautiful.? Javier`s Zinfandel Report: ?Sure Marie, you go ahead and be beautiful. The results from George?s head pruning experiment in the Zinfandel were fantastique! More bunches per vine, more weight per bunch, and super quality. Not that the old Patron asked for it, but in my opinion traditional head pruning is where we Zinfandel should be. Recall that all the nineteenth century Italian ranchers grew Zinfandel with head pruning. Surviving vineyards from this period are still producing Zinfandel wines of great quality. About 25% of my fellow Zinfandel vines are head pruned here in the MacLeod Vineyard, and George has it in his head to gradually and carefully change the entire vineyard to head pruning over some three to five years. The Zinfandel?s are with you George. Go for it!? Some Food for the Vines Thanks Marie and Javier for your votes of confidence. I?ll take the ?talking stick? back now. Last fall we added some two hundred cubic yards of very fine mulch to the entire vineyard, all placed along the vine rows. Then we seeded all with a special mix of clovers ? 40% sub clover; 25% buermedie; 16% crimson; 10% rose; and 10% Persian. This is to add organic matter to our soils, plus the roots of these clovers grow small nodules of nitrogen. We have not decided whether we will disk all in the spring or just mow. Finally of course we are all worried about our lack of rainfall and super warm January temperatures. Our tulip tree is blooming a full month ahead of time. What the unusual weather means for this year?s grapes will remain a mystery until harvest approaches. For now, we rely on the most time test farmer?s tool of all ? pure, unadulterated optimism.
Another vineyard year begins and, like the mythology Phoenix, our optimism rises yet again from the problems and ashes of previous years. 2009 is our thirtieth year farming grapes here in Sonoma Valley. On January 16th, 1979 I quit what my dear wife Greta still calls my ?good job? at Monsanto. On January 17th we moved into an abandoned shack on an entirely undeveloped 50 acres in the heart of the Valley of the Moon. Our dream was to convert this rocky hillside ranch into a beautiful vineyard, to produce grapes of exceptional quality, make lots of money selling our grapes to prestigious wineries, gain recognition, be our own bosses, and live forever! Thirty years later, the dream is still alive. I guess you could say that the MacLeods are either incredible optimistic, stubbornly persistent, or just plain slow learners.
Except for the making money part, we have been blessed to achieve every part of the dream. But we have been paid extremely generously in other coin. Years of great and interesting work for us and our family, pure joy in watching our vineyard develop as a source of great grapes, the excitement of each harvest, of beginning to make our own wine, and of making so many friends in our community. I suppose the jury is still out on the ?live forever? part of the dream. But at 87, I still can?t imagine anything I?d rather be doing. Not bad for an out-of-control retirement project.
Author`s Note: Work in the vineyard long enough, and you begin to feel that your vines have a mind of their own. So starting with last year?s Journey to Harvest, we decided to let the vines speak for themselves, selecting one vine each to represent our lead varieties and giving each a personality of their own ? Marie for the Sauvignon Blanc vines, and Javier for the Zinfandel. Again this year, I invite you to join with me in this small piece of tomfoolery, as I devote a portion of each month?s Journey to Harvest column to a flight of fancy, and imagine that the vines can speak for themselves.
The February vineyard is still asleep (dormant). But over the winter vineyard manager Chuey, sone John and the Old Patron have made some aggressive vineyard improvement plans to improve yield and quality of our grapes. Let?s hear from our vineyard vine representatives Marie and Javier:
Marie`s Sauvignon Blanc Report: ?What now? Looks like the old Patron is up to his old tricks ? expanding the use of new pruning techniques in his incessant quest for ultimate grape quality. This season we will convert an entire Sauvignon Blanc block from cordon pruning to cane pruning. Not that I mind. Last year he did a small evaluation test and had very favorable results. My cordons are about 12 to 14 years old now, and there is significant evidence that after ten or so years, cordon pruned vines gradually become less productive. The reasons are complex. Possibly repeated annual pruning has created scar tissue inside the cordon. Or perhaps there are various viruses that have invaded the cordon through unhealed pruning scars. My vine friends and I have been producing fabulous grapes, but the quantities are barely above dollar breakeven. We are, of course, worth every penny. So go for it George, experiment away and make us beautiful.?
Javier`s Zinfandel Report: ?Sure Marie, you go ahead and be beautiful. The results from George?s head pruning experiment in the Zinfandel were fantastique! More bunches per vine, more weight per bunch, and super quality. Not that the old Patron asked for it, but in my opinion traditional head pruning is where we Zinfandel should be. Recall that all the nineteenth century Italian ranchers grew Zinfandel with head pruning. Surviving vineyards from this period are still producing Zinfandel wines of great quality. About 25% of my fellow Zinfandel vines are head pruned here in the MacLeod Vineyard, and George has it in his head to gradually and carefully change the entire vineyard to head pruning over some three to five years. The Zinfandel?s are with you George. Go for it!?
Some Food for the Vines Thanks Marie and Javier for your votes of confidence. I?ll take the ?talking stick? back now. Last fall we added some two hundred cubic yards of very fine mulch to the entire vineyard, all placed along the vine rows. Then we seeded all with a special mix of clovers ? 40% sub clover; 25% buermedie; 16% crimson; 10% rose; and 10% Persian. This is to add organic matter to our soils, plus the roots of these clovers grow small nodules of nitrogen. We have not decided whether we will disk all in the spring or just mow. Finally of course we are all worried about our lack of rainfall and super warm January temperatures. Our tulip tree is blooming a full month ahead of time. What the unusual weather means for this year?s grapes will remain a mystery until harvest approaches. For now, we rely on the most time test farmer?s tool of all ? pure, unadulterated optimism.
“You feel shame when you look through their catalogs” says Tomas Pando about TOMS shoe catalogs. The TOMS brand is famous for its 'One Pair Sold = One Person Helped' campaign, trademarked as 'One For One', which sends a pair of shoes to a child in need for each pair purchased. Tomas Pando is the founder of Argentina's Paez shoes which makes simple canvas slip-ons similar to the popular Santa Monica retailer's. He told LA Weekly that TOMS’ excessive abuse of images of poverty-stricken children is “like stopping me on the street and saying, ‘I’m dying, give me a penny.’ ”"Pando promotes the quality of his shoes while giving fair-wage jobs to his employees. Paez footwear is produced in a “no-sweatshops” factory on the outskirts of Buenos Aires, where the cost to manufacture Paez shoes is $8, Pando says; he sells them for $16 in his home country."“We support giving jobs and opportunities to the people of Argentina,” he says.Alibaba.com publishes data to help manufacturers and buyers find suppliers in foreign countries and shows that a pair of slip-on canvas shoes actually costs between $3.50 and $5 to make. "TOMS sells that kind of shoe in the U.S. at retail prices ranging from $29 to $98; the “classic” sells for $44-$68" LA Weekly notes. "Then, for each shoe sold, TOMS gives away a pair of shoes costing $3.50 to $5 to produce." The cloying campaign being cheap at heart isn't the first red flag regarding TOMS. Founder and self-titled 'Chief Shoe Giver' Blake Mycoskie shocked his brand's supporters in June when he spoke at a Focus On the Family event. The Christian organization is renowned for their hateful anti-gay propaganda and stringent support of the right-wing's Defense of Marriage Act. Perhaps due to its charitable efforts, or Mycoskie's image as a carefree So-Cal hipster hanging out on his houseboat,TOMS is certainly widely regarded, by its consumers and folks aware of the brand, as quite contrary to right-wing ideals. Mycoskie has blogged apologies for his association with the group, assuring that if he had “known the full extent of Focus on the Family’s beliefs, I would not have accepted the invitation to speak.” Adding, “TOMS, and I as the founder, are passionate believers in equal human and civil rights for all.”Aren't those concepts of equal human and civil rights in conflict with his Christian Evangelical beliefs?Christianity Today reporter Sarah Pulliam Bailey revealed that Mycoskie attends Mosaic, "an L.A. evangelical Christian church that’s considered more multicultural than mainstream evangelical institutions," according to LA Weekly."Like almost all Evangelical Christian groups," religioustolerance.org says, "the The Evangelical Christian Church, Inc. (Christian Disciples) views "homosexuality" as a behavior rather than as a sexual orientation. That is: "homosexuality" is something that a person does; it is not something that a person is."Abilene Christian University, an evangelical college that refused to allow formation of a gay-straight alliance, hosted an official TOMS 'Style Your Sole' event last year, which of course Mycoskie spoke at. Willow Creek Community Church, who has promoted the idea that gays and lesbians should practice celibacy, seek therapy, or 'pray away the gay', hosted a Global Leadership Summit in June, during which Mycoskie was featured as an entrepreneur. He was scheduled to be interviewed on "leading organizations with a cause and navigating the start-up phase of an organization" for the congregation's members. Admission ranged from $149 to $399, depending on date purchased and number of people in the group, with $79 student $99 military rates available too. Should Mycoskie's religious preferences and business practices have been more transparent to his consumers, whose concerns are supposed to simply be fashion and helping those less fortunate? TOMS has donated over 1,000,000 pairs of shoes to children in need, internationally. Or is this a simple case of 'The Emperor's New Clothes'? Mycoskie has never claimed to not be an evangelical Christian and was simply assumed to be a liberal supporter much to the chagrin of those who prefer to buy from brands whose representatives support equal rights. His profit margin on the shoes could have been called into question by a concerned consumer sooner too. What do you think? Please discuss in the comments and share.
Larry King
March Madness
Natasha Fame Leslie
Ryan Seacrest
Sanu Dellafiore
John Armstrong
Fred Hanna
Georgia Hester
