Latest Public Opinion Polls:
debate, discuss and vote!


Debate the hottest political topics, poll the public opinion,
post your own opinion polls and find out what others think!

You can even post your own public opinion polls
using our poll builder and find out what others
think on the issues that matter to you!


A
B

This morning's Sunday Edition of The New York Times has sparked controversy with a scathing, yet solid, piece, "What Happened to Obama?" in which Dr. Drew Westin essentially asks why President Obama hasn't made the stand that Americans had hoped for. Time magazine blogger Joe Klein, supporting Westin's piece today, noted that it's time we discuss Obama's "curiously unsatisfying presidency". Are left-leaning Americans experiencing the aftermath of a let down that is only the product of having such high expectations or is Obama truly leaving his ideals, and ours, behind in trying too hard to compromise? Have the left lost their infamous 'hope'?


"....the arc of history does not bend toward justice through capitulation cast as compromise," Westin says in his NY Times editorial, referencing how the president is partial to paraphrasing “the arc of history”  from Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous statement "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice". 

"It does not bend," Westin continues, "when 400 people control more of the wealth than 150 million of their fellow Americans. It does not bend when the average middle-class family has seen its income stagnate over the last 30 years while the richest 1 percent has seen its income rise astronomically."

"It does not bend when we cut the fixed incomes of our parents and grandparents so hedge fund managers can keep their 15 percent tax rates. It does not bend when only one side in negotiations between workers and their bosses is allowed representation. And it does not bend when, as political scientists have shown, it is not public opinion but the opinions of the wealthy that predict the votes of the Senate. The arc of history can bend only so far before it breaks."

"Talk to leading Republicans and Democrats in Washington in the aftermath of the debt battle, and the president is pictured as an inconsistent communicator, an inexperienced negotiator, a leader who most Republicans believe, and many Democrats fear, shies from a tough fight," a column by Bloomberg News executive editor Albert R. Hunt declares.

"If the debt-ceiling fiasco was high drama," Hunt says, "try to picture the situation 16 months from now, when the consequences of Congress’s failure to reach a consensus on paring back entitlements and increasing taxes will be apparent. The result: huge spending cutbacks are scheduled to kick in, more than $3.5 trillion of the Bush tax cuts expire and it will be necessary to raise the debt ceiling again -- all at the same time.

"The stakes escalated with the Standard & Poor’s downgrade of the U.S. credit rating on Aug. 5. Clearly a blow to the president, it could boomerang on Republicans if they are seen as the impediment to rectifying the situation."

Was his handling of the debt-ceiling crisis the straw the broke the camel's back for Obama supporters? After plainly stating Wednesday's episode of MSNBC's The Ed Show that a Republican can take back the Oval Office in 2012 due to the downtrodden economy, Bill Maher reiterated on Friday that “the magic is gone” and asked his HBO show's panel if liberals were starting to have “buyer’s remorse” about the President. Could that really be the case? 

Casandra Armour Casandra Armour

A
B

In his "American Jobs Act" speech, President Obama said that recovery of the US economy will not occur in the White House, but rather in US companies. He also claimed there was nothing controversial in the bill so both Republicans and Democrats could both support it without bickering because everything in the bill is something that was previously supported by both parties. He continued saying "everything in this will be paid for, Everything." The Purpose of the Bill, according to the President, "is simple. To put more people back to work and more money in the pocket of those that are working." 

Carol E. Lee of the Wall Street Journal writes "Obama proposed limiting itemized deductions for families with taxable income of $250,000 or more a year, ending tax breaks for oil companies and corporate jet owners, and cutting out a tax break for investment-fund managers. The White House says the tax changes would take effect in 2013 and estimates they would raise $467 billion in additional revenue over 10 years." 

The Bill proposes generating revenue through these taxes to create private and public sector jobs from teachers to construction workers. Lee continued saying President "Obama made a new pitch for his plan at the White House Monday and has said he intends to campaign against Congress and Republicans in 2012 if they don't pass the bill. 'We've got to decide what our priorities are,' he said. 'Do we keep tax loopholes for oil companies, or do we put teachers back to work? Should we keep tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, or should we invest in education and technology and infrastructure?'" 

Essentially, President Barack Obama will pay for his $447 billion jobs plan by ending a series of tax breaks for oil and gas companies, hedge-fund managers, family's with more than $250,000 in yearly taxable income, and individuals making more than $200,000.This money would be used towards job creation. 

For more reading on the "American Jobs Act," please visit the following:

A. K. A. K.