The victories, and a national championship they produced, are vacated.The trophies — a copy of Reggie Bush's Heisman statuette and a crystal football for a Bowl Championship Series title — are now ghosts of Heritage Hall. The forfeiture of those wins and mementos is just a fraction of what USC lost in the wake of some of the harshest penalties in college sports history — delivered largely because the NCAA found numerous violations relating to Bush.The Trojans men's basketball program also was punished for violations related to former star player O.J. Mayo, and the school actually paid some of that in cash: a $5,000 fine and the return of $206,200 it received for participation in the 2008 NCAA tournament.No part of what USC's football program has lost can be itemized in such a straightforward way, making any attempt to tally Bush's financial impact a daunting task. Unlike public universities with budgets and expenditures open to review, USC, as a private school, is not required to make its budgets and expenses available."I can't quantify monetary damages," Athletic Director Pat Haden said.This much is clear: The football price tag already runs well into the tens of millions in lost bowl appearances, sagging attendance, attorney fees and other direct and ancillary costs.From the 2002 through 2008 seasons, USC played in seven consecutive Bowl Championship Series bowl games, appearances that annually infused millions into the school's athletic coffers. In 2009, with the NCAA's investigation looming over the program, the Trojans fell to a lesser bowl. And for last season and this next one, a two-year bowl ban that was part of the penalties eliminates that postseason revenue jolt. The school is also hustling to shore up recent drops in attendance, season-ticket subscriptions and support-group memberships.Those are only some of the more obvious tangible losses.Andrew Zimbalist, a Smith College sports economist, said USC would suffer in ways less obvious than the direct economic hit to its football revenue.Zimbalist cited recruiting as one example. David Carter, executive director of the USC Sports Business Institute, went even further, saying the intangible fallout from the Bush investigation and penalties is greater than the financial blow."The athletic brand of a school can have far-reaching impact beyond the money the athletic program brings in," he said.USC reacted accordingly. New President Max Nikias acted quickly after sanctions were announced in June 2010, removing Mike Garrett as athletic director and replacing him with Haden, a lawyer and highly respected former USC quarterback. Nikias also hired a vice president of athletic compliance and nearly tripled the size of that staff."It's about protecting the university brand," Carter said. "If the brand atrophies, that is a much bigger problem than if the athletic department has a bad year or two."Not that USC and its athletic department are hurting financially.Since the announcement of sanctions a year ago, USC has started construction on the John McKay Center, a $70-million, 110,000-square-foot building that will house football offices, training and rehabilitation facilities for all athletes and also academic services.It also struck a new licensing agreement with Silver Star Merchandising, a Texas apparel manufacturer and distributor with ties to Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, and accepted an unspecified sum to endow the athletic director's position that the school reported was the largest endowment gift ever received by the USC athletic department.And the Trojans signed off on a new Pacific 12 Conference television deal estimated to be worth $3 billion over 12 years, an average of $21 million a year for each school.In addition, the university announced it had received gifts from donors of $200 million in March, $110 million in April and $150 million in June — none related to athletics.
The trophies — a copy of Reggie Bush's Heisman statuette and a crystal football for a Bowl Championship Series title — are now ghosts of Heritage Hall.
The Trojans men's basketball program also was punished for violations related to former star player O.J. Mayo, and the school actually paid some of that in cash: a $5,000 fine and the return of $206,200 it received for participation in the 2008 NCAA tournament.
No part of what USC's football program has lost can be itemized in such a straightforward way, making any attempt to tally Bush's financial impact a daunting task. Unlike public universities with budgets and expenditures open to review, USC, as a private school, is not required to make its budgets and expenses available.
"I can't quantify monetary damages," Athletic Director Pat Haden said.
This much is clear: The football price tag already runs well into the tens of millions in lost bowl appearances, sagging attendance, attorney fees and other direct and ancillary costs.
From the 2002 through 2008 seasons, USC played in seven consecutive Bowl Championship Series bowl games, appearances that annually infused millions into the school's athletic coffers. In 2009, with the NCAA's investigation looming over the program, the Trojans fell to a lesser bowl. And for last season and this next one, a two-year bowl ban that was part of the penalties eliminates that postseason revenue jolt. The school is also hustling to shore up recent drops in attendance, season-ticket subscriptions and support-group memberships.
Those are only some of the more obvious tangible losses.
Andrew Zimbalist, a Smith College sports economist, said USC would suffer in ways less obvious than the direct economic hit to its football revenue.
Zimbalist cited recruiting as one example. David Carter, executive director of the USC Sports Business Institute, went even further, saying the intangible fallout from the Bush investigation and penalties is greater than the financial blow.
"The athletic brand of a school can have far-reaching impact beyond the money the athletic program brings in," he said.
USC reacted accordingly. New President Max Nikias acted quickly after sanctions were announced in June 2010, removing Mike Garrett as athletic director and replacing him with Haden, a lawyer and highly respected former USC quarterback. Nikias also hired a vice president of athletic compliance and nearly tripled the size of that staff.
"It's about protecting the university brand," Carter said. "If the brand atrophies, that is a much bigger problem than if the athletic department has a bad year or two."
Not that USC and its athletic department are hurting financially.
Since the announcement of sanctions a year ago, USC has started construction on the John McKay Center, a $70-million, 110,000-square-foot building that will house football offices, training and rehabilitation facilities for all athletes and also academic services.
It also struck a new licensing agreement with Silver Star Merchandising, a Texas apparel manufacturer and distributor with ties to Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, and accepted an unspecified sum to endow the athletic director's position that the school reported was the largest endowment gift ever received by the USC athletic department.
And the Trojans signed off on a new Pacific 12 Conference television deal estimated to be worth $3 billion over 12 years, an average of $21 million a year for each school.
In addition, the university announced it had received gifts from donors of $200 million in March, $110 million in April and $150 million in June — none related to athletics.
WhosRight.com on Facebook
Should Reggie Bush Have Been Forced to Give Back His Heisman?
Question 1
Cuttlefishes are not related to squids because they are a part of the fish "family".
This is a test question
I am trying a bunch of different poll systems for WP.
With Salt & A Lime: What's On Your Cinco De Mayo Playlist?
One tequila, two tequila, three tequila....floor. Dance floor, that is. Whether you're sippin'...
President George W Bush v Michael Moore, WhosRight on the Iraq War?
WhosRight? Moore or Bush on the Iraq War? Recently, Michael Moore was on Keith Olberman and...