A
B
C

People magazine broke the news yesterday that Holly Durst and Blake Julian from the Bachelor franchise are engaged.  The two met while filming the current season of Bachelor Pad 2.  The problem is that Holly Durst just ended her engagement to fellow cast mate Michael Stagliano at the beginning of this year.  


Apparently Michael and Holly were engaged and she broke off their engagement last November, then they got back together but shortly afterwards Michael ended the relationship.  They both went on to star in the second season of Bachelor Pad, along with Blake Julian.  

Over the summer we witnessed Michael deciding he was still in love with Holly but we also witnessed Holly flirting with Blake.  One of my many issues with this season of BP was watching Holly pretend she was all broken up about Michael and she was not sure what guy she wanted, Michael or Blake.  For me the choice was obvious, Michael.  

The whole season Blake was a total douche.  He lead Melissa Schreiber on (yes, I realize Melissa is crazy but you just don't treat any girl like that) while moving in on Holly.  But what pisses me off the most is that Blake proposes to Holly a few days before the last episode was filmed and Holly says yes and does not tell Michael.  So Michael finds out that his ex-fiance of less than a year is engaged to another guy on national television.  What a bitch move by Holly.  Holly's reasoning for not telling Michael is that she could not get a hold of him.  

Really?  What a bunch of s**t!  Let's say we believe she could not get a hold of Michael beforehand, Blake did not have to propose and/or Holly did not have to announce the engagement on national television.  Obviously Blake and Holly are selfish fame whores.  That's my opinion on the situation, what is yours?  Was Holly Durst's engagement announcement a total bitch move?

Lil Libs Lil Libs
Comments
Attach media:
2011-09-12 19:50:19
Casandra Armour

I won't vote since I don't know the show, but I went to high school with Holly Durst, ha.


A
2011-09-13 07:02:37
A. K.

Haha...did you really? That's crazy. Ya, what she did was pretty dirty, especially since Michael seemed to be a good guy. How was she in high school? Ruthless to guys? Or were you even friends with her?

2011-09-13 07:30:40
Casandra Armour

No, she was a few years younger than me. Her family lived down the street. Our little sisters were friends and her brother was in my grade.


2011-09-13 03:05:04
Anonymous

I noticed the ring was Neil Lane. That is who gives all of the rings to the couples on the Bachelor/Bachelorette so I think that the ring was given to him and they will probably have a televised wedding courtesy of the Bachelor/Pad. I for one will not watch it. Michael should have kept all of the money for himself. I thought they were cute and would get back together until she started purposefully flirting with Blake and hurting Michael all at once. Letting him find out on National TV like that was the most hurtful thing she could have done on top of everything else. Disgusting!


A
2011-09-13 07:05:20
A. K.

Ya, it really was bad. I can't think of a more heartless way of telling way of doing it. He was always good to her, and really wanted her back. They could have easily gotten in touch with him. Surprisingly, he handled it with exceptional class. He definitely should not have split the money.