|
Comments
Kyle Zimmer12Damn Right they have no chance! We are going to stomp them. This won't be close at all. Their RB and QB are big, but not the fastest. Our DL and MLB's will take care of them. If Relf throws up floaters like he did against Auburn, our DB's will intercept and then house them. Our offense will be better than it was against Oregon as well. Jarrett Lee didn't throw the ball often in game 2, but he was extremely efficient when he did. Geaux Tigers!
Thomas StuartCorrection to your last statement. MSU lost two of their stud O-linemen verses Auburn. One is questionable vs LSU while the other is out. So, the MSU O-lline WILL be young, or at the least, less talented than the O-line fielded against Auburn. Unless the MSU O-line backups are more than capable, the LSU defense may very well have their way with the dawgs this evening. Under the circumstances, the likelihood of a MSU victory has decreased. But this is why the game is played and victories aren't decided on paper. Should be a good game. Brian JohnsonThanks for the correction. I didn't read that anywhere. It was a good, hard hitting game, but LSU's defense was too much for MSU. |
|
A
A. K.
LSU is going to kill MSU. If my Tigers could beat them, and we are seriously young, then LSU shouldn't have a problem. Our biggest problem against them was stopping the run. Chris Relf and Vic Ballard were simply bigger than us and gave us problems all game. LSU's defense is a completely different animal, and that is why LSU wins big and covers the spread!